The Rock Bottom of Reality


Dialogues #72

​Read in browser↗️​

Our sentences about composite objects (e.g., 'There is a table in the room') are not made true or false by the world in the way we usually think.

- Mark Balaguer


For someone who claims that everything that exists is physical, they will need to specify exactly what they mean by that term, and what counts as physical evidence for a claim. It’s not as easy as one might think. One way to get at what we might mean by physical is by theoretically simplifying reality as much as possible, and seeing what it reveals about our actual, complex reality.

For example, for any object in the universe, you could run this same thought experiment:

A maroon, ceramic coffee mug sits in front of me on my desk. It’s made out of smaller parts that I can’t individually see, like aluminum, silicon, and oxygen. The mug appears to me as a completely solid object, with no space between any of its parts. But, of course, that’s only because of my perception scale relative to the mug. If my eyes could zoom in to the mug, to as small of a scale as I wanted, I would see vast amounts of weird-looking stuff buzzing around between all those molecules.

Let’s assume that at some point you would reach the ultimate, indivisible building blocks of the physical world. Scientists used to think that what we now know as atoms couldn’t be split. Then they split atoms into smaller parts. So to avoid confusion I won’t use the term “atom”. Instead, we’ll call the ultimate, indivisible building blocks of the physical world bits. Bits are just objects we stipulate based on theory; we haven’t seen them or measured them with instruments. But whatever characteristics they have, we will assume the rock bottom of reality is all made up of bits. It may turn out that we are wrong. But the theoretical alternative—that the physical world can keep getting split infinitely—makes less sense to me. It seems like there must be a stopping point where you can’t split the thing anymore. We’ll call that thing a bit.

Now take this bit assumption and imagine a universe that includes only one bit. That’s it. The only physical thing that exists is this one bit.

It can’t be divided, it isn’t related in any way to any other physical objects, and it isn’t a part of anything else. If any object is a candidate to be a purely physical object, this one is.

Let’s add just one more bit to this simple universe and see what happens. Imagine a universe with just two bits.

Now we can start asking all kinds of questions about this two-bit world that will apply to the vastly more complex objects we encounter at the human scale, like my maroon coffee mug. For example, maybe the two bits are very close together, so we can call them one pair. And we can call that one pair whatever we want, like one bitto. Two bits become one bitto whenever they are close together. So in addition to the two bits, we now also have one bitto. So how many objects do we have? Still two? Three? Now change the distance between the two bits in this universe to one light year.

Do we still have one bitto, or is that too far of a distance to count as one? At what point exactly do we have too much distance between them that we no longer have this one thing that’s a bitto? If the answers aren’t abundantly clear, what does that say about what makes something physical?

Most importantly, for any question we can ask about our very simple, two-bit universe, we also need to ask what physical evidence we can point to in this most simple universe for whatever answer we give. Because physical evidence is the only kind of evidence that the physicalist allows…right?

Next time we’ll talk about what we could mean by physical object when our toy universe gets more complex than just two bits.

Until next time.

Jared


Missed a week?

You can access all previous newsletters on my Creator Profile here.

I am an affiliate of Kit, the newsletter service I use to send this out weekly. If you are interested in creating your own newsletter, I couldn't recommend it more highly. Click here to get started using my affiliate link!


If you like listening to just audio in the car, on a run, or while you're supposed to be working, subscribe to the podcast so you never miss an episode:

If you like watching the conversation, subscribe, and the latest episode will show up in your feed. (Extra credit: like whatever videos you watch if you genuinely like what you're hearing.)

Take a sec to follow me on your favorite social platform:​



600 1st Ave, Ste 330 PMB 92768, Seattle, WA 98104-2246

This email contains affiliate links, which means I’ll earn commission on any purchases made through my link. This supports me to keep making content for you!​
​Unsubscribe · Preferences​

Dr. Jared Oliphint's Newsletter

Subscribe here so you never miss a post, a podcast episode, or an opportunity to learn even more through a philosophy course 👇🏻

Read more from Dr. Jared Oliphint's Newsletter
video preview

Dialogues #76 Read in browser↗️ "A widget in a box to one person is a finished product to somebody else. And in the interconnectedness of our economy... there are so few merely routine, mundane functions. It can seem that way to people if they don't think through it. But when you think through it, you realize that you're playing a role in a process that is actually quite meaningful." - David Bahnsen David Bahnsen founded The Bahnsen Group and oversees the management of over $9 billion in...

video preview

Dialogues #75 Read in browser↗️ When you talk about philosophy, a lot of people's eyes glaze over because they had certain experiences with philosophy. - Gary Gulman I had no idea Gary Gulman cared so much about philosophy. But it shouldn’t have surprised me. I’ve been a fan of standup comedy for as long as I can remember. My earliest impression probably came from watching Ed McMahon introduce comedians on Star Search. I have this foggy memory as a kid that I couldn’t believe standup comedy...

Dialogues #74 Read in browser↗️ "A business that makes nothing but money is a poor business." - Henry Ford I can't wait for you to hear the next podcast episode. A well-known comedian I've followed for over 20 years has been thinking a lot about philosophy lately. It should be out next week. But first: I’ve been thinking recently about business ethics. In a Harvard Business Review study, employees reported that the most important factor for their job was not a promotion, not better working...